B Happy...Go Surf!!!

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: It was never the Ukraine
Topic Summary: It was always Russia
Created On: 12/03/2019 09:13 AM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/03/2019 09:13 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Greensleeves - 12/03/2019 10:02 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/03/2019 10:09 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - theglide - 12/03/2019 10:13 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/03/2019 10:56 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/03/2019 12:15 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - somebodyelse - 12/03/2019 04:09 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/03/2019 04:29 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 06:35 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - HAPDigital - 12/04/2019 07:08 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - 3rdworldlover - 12/04/2019 07:13 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Cole - 12/04/2019 07:16 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 07:22 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - 3rdworldlover - 12/04/2019 07:48 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 08:13 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Cole - 12/04/2019 07:53 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 08:11 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - HAPDigital - 12/04/2019 08:22 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/04/2019 08:46 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - 3rdworldlover - 12/04/2019 09:13 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - HAPDigital - 12/04/2019 09:44 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Cole - 12/05/2019 03:51 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - wtf - 12/04/2019 09:44 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 11:22 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/04/2019 12:30 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 12:37 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Fish Killer - 12/04/2019 01:16 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 02:41 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - HAPDigital - 12/04/2019 03:31 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/04/2019 01:19 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/04/2019 01:47 PM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/05/2019 05:24 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Sniper - 12/05/2019 05:42 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - RustyTruck - 12/05/2019 06:00 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/05/2019 06:50 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - jdbman - 12/05/2019 08:48 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - somebodyelse - 12/05/2019 09:19 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - RustyTruck - 12/05/2019 09:49 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - somebodyelse - 12/05/2019 10:20 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Greensleeves - 12/05/2019 10:17 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - somebodyelse - 12/05/2019 10:26 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Greensleeves - 12/05/2019 10:34 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - somebodyelse - 12/05/2019 10:36 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - RustyTruck - 12/05/2019 10:43 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - Greensleeves - 12/05/2019 10:45 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - somebodyelse - 12/05/2019 10:59 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - fishkller - 12/05/2019 11:43 AM  
 It was never the Ukraine   - johnnyboy - 12/05/2019 12:51 PM  
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 12/04/2019 06:35 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8907
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

I'm not saying that Russia absolutely did not hack the DNC but I'm keeping an open mind about what may have happened. The same people saying that without a doubt, Russia was responsible for the hack are the same people who were proven wrong by the Mueller investigation.

"We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute," - James Comey

When asked if investigating the actual server would have helped the FBI track down the culprit, the FBI declined to comment.

To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom. Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their "judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact." - The Nation (hardly a conservative publication)

Anytime you see anything from an unnamed source, an anonymous source, you have the government saying "just trust us on this one", or anything of the like, you would be wise to proceed cautiously.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

“Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer” ~ Rick Sanchez
 12/04/2019 07:08 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: Sniper

I'm not saying that Russia absolutely did not hack the DNC but I'm keeping an open mind about what may have happened. The same people saying that without a doubt, Russia was responsible for the hack are the same people who were proven wrong by the Mueller investigation.



"We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute," - James Comey



When asked if investigating the actual server would have helped the FBI track down the culprit, the FBI declined to comment.



To this day, however, the intelligence agencies that released this assessment have failed to provide the American people with any actual evidence substantiating their claims about how the DNC material was obtained or by whom. Astonishingly and often overlooked, the authors of the declassified ICA themselves admit that their "judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be a fact." - The Nation (hardly a conservative publication)



Anytime you see anything from an unnamed source, an anonymous source, you have the government saying "just trust us on this one", or anything of the like, you would be wise to proceed cautiously.


Yeah, I mean for all we know Fiji could've meddled in our elections. Right?
 12/04/2019 07:13 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


3rdworldlover

Posts: 22805
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Remarkable that it barely even registered in the news cycle, when evidence was released after Roger Stone's conviction, that Trump was informed of Russia's hacking of the DNC in April of 2016, and that Trump lied about it in his written statements to the FBI.
 12/04/2019 07:16 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 70081
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Russia was responsible for the hack are the same people who were proven wrong by the Mueller investigation.

Um, Mueller's report said that Russia hacked the election and that they are still a serious threat.

Seriously, where do you get your news?

-------------------------
I was right.
 12/04/2019 07:22 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8907
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Usually, I link sources. They are the blue letters. Try clicking them.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

“Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer” ~ Rick Sanchez
 12/04/2019 07:48 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


3rdworldlover

Posts: 22805
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Maybe check Page 36 of Mueller's Report?

RUSSIAN HACKING AND DUMPING OPERATIONS .................................................. ...... ............. 36
A. GRU Hacking Directed at the Clinton Campaign ................. .......... ............... ............. 36
1. GRU Units Target the Clinton Campaign .................. . .... . .... . ......... . ...................... 36
2. Intrusions into the DCCC and DNC Networks ................... ................... ............... 38
a. Initial Access .................................... ............................................... ................. 38
b. Implantation ofMalware on DCCC and DNC Networks ................................ 38
c. Theft of Documents from DNC and DCCC Networks .................................... 40
B. Dissemination of the Hacked Materials ................. ......... ......................... ................... 41
I. DCL eaks ........ ............................. ................................. .................. .................. ..... 41
2. Guccifer 2.0 ............ .............. .................. ............. .................................................. 42
3. Use of WikiLeaks .................
 12/04/2019 08:13 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8907
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Originally posted by: 3rdworldlover

Maybe check Page 36 of Mueller's Report?

RUSSIAN HACKING AND DUMPING OPERATIONS .................................................. ...... ............. 36

A. GRU Hacking Directed at the Clinton Campaign ................. .......... ............... ............. 36

1. GRU Units Target the Clinton Campaign .................. . .... . .... . ......... . ...................... 36

2. Intrusions into the DCCC and DNC Networks ................... ................... ............... 38

a. Initial Access .................................... ............................................... ................. 38

b. Implantation ofMalware on DCCC and DNC Networks ................................ 38

c. Theft of Documents from DNC and DCCC Networks .................................... 40

B. Dissemination of the Hacked Materials ................. ......... ......................... ................... 41

I. DCL eaks ........ ............................. ................................. .................. .................. ..... 41

2. Guccifer 2.0 ............ .............. .................. ............. .................................................. 42

3. Use of WikiLeaks .................


And, the Mueller Report based this on what? A server they never had full access to? Taking the DNC's word for it? Taking the word of a company being paid by the DNC?

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

“Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer” ~ Rick Sanchez
 12/04/2019 07:53 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 70081
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

1) The link you posted never mentions Ukraine as the culprit, as you have argued.

2) There is a detailed report on the investigation.

http://www.us-cert.gov/sites/d...0STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf

Then there is this from the link you posted.

We have also learned since publication, from longtime VIPS member Thomas Drake, that there is a dispute among VIPS members themselves about the July 24 memo. This is not the first time a VIPS report has been internally disputed, but it is the first time one has been released over the substantive objections of several VIPS members. With that in mind, we asked Drake and those VIPS members who agree with him to present their dissenting view. We also asked VIPS members who stand by their report to respond.

Which brings me to the question: Do you read the links you post?

-------------------------
I was right.

Edited: 12/04/2019 at 07:54 AM by Cole
 12/04/2019 08:11 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8907
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Originally posted by: Cole

1) The link you posted never mentions Ukraine as the culprit, as you have argued.

2) There is a detailed report on the investigation.

http://www.us-cert.gov/sites/d...E-2016-1229.pdf


Then there is this from the link you posted.

We have also learned since publication, from longtime VIPS member Thomas Drake, that there is a dispute among VIPS members themselves about the July 24 memo. This is not the first time a VIPS report has been internally disputed, but it is the first time one has been released over the substantive objections of several VIPS members. With that in mind, we asked Drake and those VIPS members who agree with him to present their dissenting view. We also asked VIPS members who stand by their report to respond.

Which brings me to the question: Do you read the links you post?


Yeah, I never mentioned Ukraine being the culprit. It wouldn't have to be hacked at all if someone had access to the system.

I saw the quote you mentioned. I'm still interested in hearing what both sides have to say.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

“Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer” ~ Rick Sanchez
 12/04/2019 08:22 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: Sniper

Originally posted by: Cole



1) The link you posted never mentions Ukraine as the culprit, as you have argued.



2) There is a detailed report on the investigation.



">http://www.us-cert.gov/sites/d....pdf





Then there is this from the link you posted.



We have also learned since publication, from longtime VIPS member Thomas Drake, that there is a dispute among VIPS members themselves about the July 24 memo. This is not the first time a VIPS report has been internally disputed, but it is the first time one has been released over the substantive objections of several VIPS members. With that in mind, we asked Drake and those VIPS members who agree with him to present their dissenting view. We also asked VIPS members who stand by their report to respond.



Which brings me to the question: Do you read the links you post?




Yeah, I never mentioned Ukraine being the culprit. It wouldn't have to be hacked at all if someone had access to the system.



I saw the quote you mentioned. I'm still interested in hearing what both sides have to say.


I know right? It could be Somalia. I'm thinking maybe it was Barbados but you know it could have been Canada or even Sweden. Our FBI and Intelligence services say it was Russian. But you know, it could be Austria. We'll never know....
Statistics
146531 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 1 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

First there was Air Jordan .