Hey Matt B ... How the hell o are you ??? :)

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'
Topic Summary:
Created On: 10/11/2018 09:55 AM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/11/2018 09:55 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - johnnyboy - 10/11/2018 10:37 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - tpapablo - 10/11/2018 11:11 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - johnnyboy - 10/11/2018 11:57 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/11/2018 03:57 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - fishkller - 10/11/2018 04:40 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - sandi - 10/12/2018 12:08 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - WG - 10/12/2018 08:22 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - scombrid - 10/13/2018 07:46 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - fishkller - 10/13/2018 08:25 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/13/2018 06:04 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/13/2018 06:42 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/13/2018 07:26 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/13/2018 07:33 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/13/2018 08:13 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/13/2018 08:16 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/13/2018 08:22 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - sandi - 10/13/2018 08:24 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/13/2018 08:26 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/13/2018 08:30 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/13/2018 08:38 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - harrietdubman - 10/14/2018 02:21 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/15/2018 05:52 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/17/2018 03:10 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Cole - 10/17/2018 05:42 AM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - WG - 10/14/2018 03:25 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/14/2018 04:11 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - fishkller - 10/14/2018 04:55 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - fishkller - 10/14/2018 04:56 PM  
 Scarborough: 'The Kavanaugh Hearings Were a Disaster for the Democratic Party'   - Fish Killer - 10/17/2018 03:45 PM  
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 10/13/2018 07:33 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: Cole

Informed people know that the polls evened up right before the election.
Uninformed<---------FK


Liar!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.
 10/13/2018 08:13 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68649
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

The data exists, you fool.

-------------------------
I was right.
 10/13/2018 08:16 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: Cole

The data exists, you fool.



Prove it!

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were NEVER 'even' in the polls before election!

EVER!

The best I saw was Clinton with a 3% point LEAD!

(...and that was on the last day with altered data)


-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Edited: 10/13/2018 at 08:20 PM by Fish Killer
 10/13/2018 08:22 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68649
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

And if you look back at those much-derided polls, the additions of these late-deciders to the calculus doesn't make them look so bad. If you take the final RealClearPolitics average in each state and adjust for the late-decider swing, Trump actually should have been the winner in Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

The final polling average had Clinton by one point in Florida, about even in Michigan and up two in Pennsylvania. Each of those averages went a little toward Trump at the end, thanks to GOP pollster Trafalgar Group doing one-day polls the Sunday before Election Day. But even without the Trafalgar polls, the apparent late-decider Trump surge could help explain why they had the "wrong" winner.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/...utm_term=.0488ea76ea94

-------------------------
I was right.
 10/13/2018 08:24 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


sandi

Posts: 8934
Joined Forum: 03/26/2007

so after the midterms?

what will you say then?

lil' f'er...
 10/13/2018 08:26 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: Cole

And if you look back at those much-derided polls, the additions of these late-deciders to the calculus doesn't make them look so bad. If you take the final RealClearPolitics average in each state and adjust for the late-decider swing, Trump actually should have been the winner in Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania.



The final polling average had Clinton by one point in Florida, about even in Michigan and up two in Pennsylvania. Each of those averages went a little toward Trump at the end, thanks to GOP pollster Trafalgar Group doing one-day polls the Sunday before Election Day. But even without the Trafalgar polls, the apparent late-decider Trump surge could help explain why they had the "wrong" winner.




http://www.washingtonpost.com/...utm_term=.0488ea76ea94


"The Telegraph's poll tracker, which was based on an average of the last five polls published on RealClearPolitics, showed Clinton leading with three percentage points over Trump.
American statistics and polling analysis site FiveThirtyEight gave Trump a 30 per cent chance of victory going into the final few days. This chance - the same as winning at rock, paper, scissors - was generous compared to other forecasters."


-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.
 10/13/2018 08:30 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68649
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

The final polling average had Clinton by one point in Florida, about even in Michigan and up two in Pennsylvania.

They gave trump the victory.

Give up, you lost.

-------------------------
I was right.
 10/13/2018 08:38 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: Cole

The final polling average had Clinton by one point in Florida, about even in Michigan and up two in Pennsylvania.



They gave trump the victory.



Give up, you lost.


LIAR!

"The Telegraph's poll tracker, which was based on an average of the last five polls published on RealClearPolitics, showed Clinton leading with three percentage points over Trump.
American statistics and polling analysis site FiveThirtyEight gave Trump a 30 per cent chance of victory going into the final few days. This chance - the same as winning at rock, paper, scissors - was generous compared to other forecasters."

That would be 5 polls NOT ONE!

AND...FiveThirtyEight is an average of ALL main polls!

IDIOT!





-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Edited: 10/13/2018 at 08:46 PM by Fish Killer
 10/14/2018 02:21 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


harrietdubman

Posts: 279
Joined Forum: 11/07/2015

havehernaugh's wife looks like the type that thinks the female orgasm is a myth.

-------------------------

sneedeker

 10/15/2018 05:52 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68649
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Originally posted by: Fish Killer

Originally posted by: Cole



The final polling average had Clinton by one point in Florida, about even in Michigan and up two in Pennsylvania.







They gave trump the victory.







Give up, you lost.




LIAR!



"The Telegraph's poll tracker, which was based on an average of the last five polls published on RealClearPolitics, showed Clinton leading with three percentage points over Trump.

American statistics and polling analysis site FiveThirtyEight gave Trump a 30 per cent chance of victory going into the final few days. This chance - the same as winning at rock, paper, scissors - was generous compared to other forecasters."



That would be 5 polls NOT ONE!



AND...FiveThirtyEight is an average of ALL main polls!



IDIOT!


Hey doo doo dunderhead, the margin of error is three or four points out of 100.

Clown.



-------------------------
I was right.
 10/17/2018 03:10 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

SO!

If someone is three points ahead...they are STILL ahead!

Idiot!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.
 10/17/2018 05:42 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68649
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Margin of error, +4 to -4.

Plus three is an even race. Moron.

-------------------------
I was right.
Statistics
146502 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 3 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

First there was Air Jordan .