Trump's second book after "Running the Country (into the ground) For Dummies"

Pelosi asks House to pursue articles of impeachment

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday said that she is asking her colleagues to pursue articles of impeachment against President Trump for his "failure to faithfully execute the law" in his dealings with Ukraine. 'The president leaves us no choice but to act' because he is trying to corrupt, once again, the election for his own benefit.'

The facts are uncontested," she said. "The president abused his power for his own personal political benefit at the expense of our national security by withholding military aid and a crucial Oval Office meeting in exchange for an announcement of an investigation into his political rival."

-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project

Edited: 12/05/2019 at 11:53 AM by Pagerow

2020....

DONE!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

"The facts are uncontested," she said."

Liar!

The facts are seriously CONTESTED!

Your sham witch hunt is about to get exposed by the Senate!

FOOLS!

http://www.bizpacreview.com/20...ADRWux5WCoczXMRYBqQpr0

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Edited: 12/05/2019 at 12:30 PM by Fish Killer

And now for the Senate to go on the historical record as also being corrupt and complicit- and then the American people will be the final judge and jury


As a guy who used to frequent these forums liked to say, 2020... DONE!

-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

The Senate is going to tell the people not to believe their lying eyes, and he's going to get re-elected because the Dems would rather torpedo Bernie and lose than have to actually work on structural change to failing capitalism.




-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

Yeah, but at least we'll find out who the traitors are on the Senate side. They will take their own name down in the dregs of history...

-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project

Edited: 12/05/2019 at 01:05 PM by Pagerow

RustyTruck: The Senate is going to tell the people not to believe their lying eyes,.... The Senate is saying WATCH the proceedings, SEE the testimony with YOUR OWN EYES.... That is the Senates entire defense of Trump, watch the proceedings with your own eyes rather than listening to talking heads and 3rd hand opinions... The Republicans questions ARE: Did you see this with your own eyes or did somebodyelse tell you about it? Did you hear this with your own ears or did somebody say they thought they heard some other person say that in their opinion something happened?

-------------------------


Edited: 12/06/2019 at 07:57 AM by somebodyelse

Heresay dont get it

No, the GOP plan is to try and delegitimize the process, deflect, distract, and ignore. The facts are undisputed. They have to convince the people to ignore them, and for the 38% of the country with malignant confirmation bias and a 5th grade education, it's not a hard sell in some places.

The outcome is a foregone conclusion.


-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

Rusty: The facts are undisputed...... That is Pelosi's LIE... why do you repeat it? The so called facts are all OPINIONS, 2nd hand, 3rd hand hearsay... There are NO UNDISPUTED FACTS at all, every single piece of so-called evidence is under dispute. The Democrats call a witness, that witness gives an opinion on 3rd hand knowledge, The Democrats announce we have undisputed FACTS, you with a malignant confirmation Bias, believe them. Five minutes later a Republican asks that same person, Did you see it, did you hear it, do you have ANY FACTS and EVERY SINGLE WITNESS SAYS: NO I didn't see anything. NO I didn't hear anything factual, NO I do not have ANY FIRST HAND FACTS.... BUT yes, those with confirmation Bias still Parrot Pelosi's obvious lies...

-------------------------


Edited: 12/06/2019 at 08:50 AM by somebodyelse

nobodyelse happily tricked by his overlords

Here is one of the many GOP geezer hopey changey defenses that make no f-ing sense:

Did you see OJ do the murders? No. Then he didn't do them.

Edited: 12/06/2019 at 08:11 AM by Greensleeves

Is what the President said to Zelensky on the phone call under dispute? 'I would like you to do us a favor' said the stooge

Is the fact that the aide to the Ukraine was delayed under dispute?

Is the fact that the Whitehouse has refused subpoenas under dispute? (Cited as obstruction of Congress against Nixon in his proceedings)

twitler is getting impeached.

Fact - Trump withheld aid to Ukraine
Fact - He send his personal attorney to lobby them to announce an investigation into Biden
Fact - He's on record telling the pres of Ukraine "I want you to do me a favor..."
Fact - When confronted with whistleblower testimony, he suddenly released the aide

He used the power of the office to influence a foreign government to investigate a political rival for personal gain. Cut and dry.

Rudy is over there now, still trying to get help from corrupt Ukrainians.

-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

Perfect. Let it go to the Senate, put the Bidens under oath, and let's see if the Bidens' activity warranted investigation.

Put the whistleblower under oath. Let's find out if the whistleblower, who worked for Biden, is really a whistleblower or if he is just leaking the details of the President's phone conversations and violating Executive privilege in the process.

As soon as this becomes a bipartisan investigation, things are going to go all kinds of sideways for the Dems.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

Edited: 12/06/2019 at 10:41 AM by Sniper

You want to shift the focus to the Bidens, but all sources have found no evidence of illegal activities involving them. Traditional influence peddling and graft, no doubt, but nothing that the trump family isn't up to it's neck in.

The whistleblower is protected by law passed by bipartisan Congress, and their claims have been proven and admitted by the WH, so again, an attempt to deflect and distract.

The whistleblower was already checked out and found to be credible using the fully legal chain of command and procedures.

But for someone who desperately wants their dear leader to avoid accountability, it doesn't take anything but someone telling them what they want to hear, obviously.

What's the president's personal lawyer doing in Ukraine at this very moment?


-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

The whistleblower is protected against retaliation in the workplace. That's it. Not sure where you guys are hearing otherwise but he isn't guaranteed anonymity and the law does not say that whistleblowers are prohibited from being called to the stand.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

They can call anyone want to the stand but that doesn't mean they have the right to make the whistleblower take the stand. You understand that, right?

Trump's people - Pompeo, Mulvaney, Bolton, Gouliani - will have to speak under oath and be questioned by Democratic Senators. Think about that for a minute. lol

-------------------------
I was right.

Well do your best then.

-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

Wrong again...

RS, Sept. 23: Section 7(b) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) provides for the identity of an employee making a complaint, such as a whistleblower, to remain undisclosed to the extent practicable:

The Inspector General shall not, after receipt of a complaint or information from an employee, disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee, unless the Inspector General determines such disclosure is unavoidable during the course of the investigation.

The IG has not determined such a disclosure to be unavoidable.

The whistle blower claims have been verified. Getting him/her to testify is just part of the Republican, "Shit, we don't know what to do," dog and pony show.

-------------------------
I was right.

-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

Exactly. What's the difference who it is? The IG has determined it to be a legit WB claim and there is evidence they tried to cover it up at DNI, DOJ and WH.

HAHAHA, Schitt was so hasty to release the impeachment transcripts that he didn't delete the whistle blowers NAME from them... So his adamant 'I don't know who it is and I've never talked to the whistle blower' WAS Blown out of the water by SCHITTS OWN RELEASE of documents,...

-------------------------

Post your source for this one.

To think, the name may have been released by suspected leaker's team after the Media(D) refused to publish it. How ironic. Now that the Impeachment Inquiry has been made official, the Democrats are releasing transcripts of the testimony of the select witnesses that they had gathered and questioned in the very private basement meeting room. One transcript that they claim is "damning" is the testimony of Ambassador William Taylor. On page 236, one unredacted name stands out during the questioning of Ambassador Taylor - Eric Ciaramella. Republican committee lawyer Steve Castor asked Taylor directly if he knew the name Eric Ciaramella, who has been identified by investigative journalist Paul Sperry as the whistleblower. ........... GOOGLE IT, Or just Google Eric Ciaramella... Too much dirt to post here...

-------------------------

Just now, IG Horrowitz before Senate Judiciary Committee (Person that helped author the law):

"Whistleblowers have a right to expect complete and full confidentiality in all circumstances, it's in the law in the IG Act that Congress wrote and it is a very important provision."

Well there you have it, from the horse's mouth just minutes ago.

I thought this was a very interesting excerpt from the hearing and a great way to rub in the fact that Sniper and Somefooly are wrong, just winging it as usual.

SO, If there is an impeachment trial... AND the Republicans call one Eric Ciaramella to the stand... Are the Democrats going to stand up and say you can't bring the whistle blower to the stand??? The whistle Blower has to be protected?? That would be a fun moment. because of course nobody knows the whistleblowers name... So what does happen if the whistle blower is accidently called to testify??

-------------------------

Oh really? Have a real investigation not just parroting your masters. Truly you have consumed some serious delusion pie

LOL You didn't read a word he wrote. Another dumb fuck.

Oh look, dotards don't know what a FACT is, how shocking...

-------------------------
QOP = Terrorists
FK = Gay

...[]



-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project

Edited: 12/06/2019 at 10:48 AM by Pagerow

pics or it didnt happen.

-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

What's significant and interesting about the whistleblower is that his (or her) complaint set off a whole series of reactions in the White House and Congress. There's now plenty of testimony that the phone call and related events were extraordinary, including two career employees who quit their jobs in protest or fear of legal liability. But the whole series of events might have pretty much gone unnoticed and efforts to keep things quiet might have worked but for the whistleblower. For younger people, it may be fun when Trump's White House records are released, maybe 50 or 75 years after the fact.

This is actually an excellent way to see what crap sources have been filling up SomebodyFish's delicate mind.

I *did* research this story and first off, it's an old tale from back in early November that never grew any legs. So "comes out" a month ago and shits the bed.

Here's a google search on the story:

http://www.google.com/search?c...s+name+in+transcripts


You will see that the #1 source for this story is the bullshit "One America News Network" and even THEY have removed it. - Click the link.. it now 404's.

Next up you have the prestigious Daily Wire.. again back on November 7th.

Followed by the ever so credible RedState.com and Washington Examiner.


After that the google searchresults pitter out into other topics. No credible sources, and not even enough to populate an entire Google search page.

What a "BOMBSHELL!!!!!!!!!"

In fact, it is such a BOMBSHELL!!!!!!!!! that even FOX News didn't report on it.

Game Changer!!




Same crap different search term:

http://www.google.com/search?q...blowers+name+redacted



Was that NobodyElse, Tpap and Garyfish standing out in front of the Post Office today, waving signs to "Defend Trump?"






-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

Edited: 12/09/2019 at 01:49 PM by fishkller

Members of the conservative media have been publishing the alleged whistleblower's name ever since investigative journalist Paul Sperry's October 31st report which clearly named Ciaramella. His name began appearing on some conservative websites in early October.... Still, most large media outlets refuse to publish his name. Surprisingly, even Fox News has ordered their writers and contributors not to divulge the name claiming it hasn't been confirmed. Others point to his status as a whistleblower who deserves protection under the whistleblower statute which I find to be ridiculous. This young man is anything but a whistleblower. He is a highly partisan Democrat who is part of a soft coup to take out the President.... Democrats want to prevent Ciaramella from testifying under oath before lawmakers, because their entire case depends on his credibility as a true whistleblower. Once the American people are presented with Ciaramella's work history, his associations and his activities during the 2016 election and beyond, he will have zero credibility and voters will see for themselves that once again, the Democrats, rather than the Republicans, have tried to subvert the U.S. system of justice... Fishklutz sees that the name has been REDACTED off of many web pages and doesn't question why, he says see, its redacted that means it was never there to begin with... OLD TALE.. From NOVEMBER... well that's past your 5 minutes of attention span...

-------------------------

Chumpfdirts: set your infobart decoders to receive! You can nip that Soros funded space alien/ anteefus deepstate uprising and and insurrection in the bud!
Vigilance comrades! Your mighty orange messiah is bringing back fat Alex, lil
richie spencer, and the cryin nazi to lead you to glory!
And as always: SILVER foil hats! Soros has fiendishly defeated your best tin foil defenses!
Nanu nanu fellow travelers!

-------------------------
It's a democratic hoax

Edited: 12/10/2019 at 12:59 PM by nukeh2o

When you have no clue how stupid you are....^^^^

^^^^^When you have no clue that your party just assassinated themselves!^^^^^

Moron!

2020...done...for sure...100%!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Edited: 12/10/2019 at 01:01 PM by Fish Killer

What's MILO! reeaally like, Swishy? Need a true, actual rechumplican hero like that about now, huh Fish Goober?
duuuhhuuhuuh..........


-------------------------
It's a democratic hoax

More Americans favor impeachment. This might play out in senate more than know.

More Americans favor impeachment. This might play out in senate more than know........ NO, get your head out of your Bubble.... Most Americans DO NOT favor impeachment.... The numbers of those For impeachment have FALLEN in the last month... The numbers of Independents for impeachment has Fallen, the numbers of Democrats for impeachment has fallen... Trumps Poll numbers against the leading Democrats has gone up by 10 to 12 points.... Trump used to poll behind all the leading Democrats for President, NOW HE LEADS ALL OF THE DEMOCRATS... If the election was held today, TRUMP WOULD WIN!!!

-------------------------

If my head is in my ass, why is it yours that smells of crap?

48.4% Support
44.7% Don't Support

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/impeachment-polls/


They've actually risen since November.

Half of registered voters, 50 percent, approve of the current impeachment inquiry, the poll shows. That's greater than the 42 percent who oppose it. Eight percent of voters don't have an opinion.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/11/poll-impeachment-voter-support-081122


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/historian-says-trump-is-in-deep-trouble-after-recent-impeachment-poll-2019-12-01

By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, more young voters support than oppose the impeachment of President Donald Trump and his removal from office, according to a new national poll released Monday by the Institute of Politics at the Harvard Kennedy School.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/18/young-voters-overwhelmingly-want-trump-impeached-removed-office-poll-finds/4228474002/

oll: 70% of Americans say Trump's Ukraine actions were 'wrong,' 51% want him removed

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/18/poll-seventy-percent-trump-ukraine-actions-wrong/4227312002/

Hapdigital: If my head is in my ass, why is it yours that smells of crap..... Wow, it is kind of telling that you read head in your ASS when I said head in your Bubble... That's a Freudian slip? or is it a scatological slip, I don't know which... But head in ass aside: In October, 48 percent of Independent's supported impeaching Trump, with 39 percent in opposition. Now, the tides have turned. 49 percent of Independents oppose impeachment, while only 34 percent support it. That's a 15-point margin in opposition of impeachment among Independent voters. The results from these open-door impeachment hearings are helping Trump's case for reelection. There are two narratives circulating in the media. The first, there is no question Trump bribed Ukraine and he must be impeached. The second, this impeachment is a partisan witch hunt. According to the most recent data, the narrative that impeachment is a partisan witch hunt is the one more Independent and key swing voters believe. Not only does this data show Democrats are losing Independents in the impeachment hearings, but Emerson's poll also finds Trump's national approval has increased from October to November. "Trump's approval has increased in the last month with 48% approval and 47% disapproval, a bounce from 43% approval in the last Emerson National poll in October," the poll reads. A Marquette Law School poll released on Wednesday found that just 40 percent of voters in the swing state of Wisconsin thought Trump should be impeached compared to 53 percent who felt he should not. Opposition by independents to the House's ongoing impeachment inquiry jumped 10 percentage points in the last week, according to a Politico - Morning Consult poll released Tuesday. The poll showed 47 percent of independents opposed the inquiry, compared to 37 percent last week. Meanwhile support for the inquiry by independents fell 7 points to 40 percent.

-------------------------

Wrong all around but whatevers. We know you like fabricated 'facts'. Been there seen that.

Here is the telling factors.... Democrats are going to blindly vote for whoever their party tells them too. Republicans are going with the Economy... It is the Independents that are going to swing this election and the Independents DO NOT SUPPORT Impeachment, they BELIEVE it is a partisan witch hunt... Do you know yet who your party is going to hand 1/3 of all the Democrat delegates to? Have your party bosses assigned their 'Super' delegates yet? Because then your vote doesn't matter for shit...

-------------------------

The old perpetuated myth that independents swing elections. LOL

i am independent moderate and support impeachment. half the liberals think i am a conservative here and blame me for trump being elected. dem wins, pugs blame independents and 3rd party voters. pug wins, dems blame independents and third party voters. it is tired and overplayed shit both parties keep trying to sell and is equally ridiculous regardless of who is in office. anyhow doesnt matter the president is a narcissist and a proven liar. what matters is he used his office for personal gain. that is why i support impeachment

Edited: 12/11/2019 at 08:12 AM by RiddleMe

DOJ IG Horowitz confirms to Leahy that pro-Trump text messages from FBI agents were also discovered by the IG's office: "That's correct. That's in the report."

-------------------------
So if you are a surfer I wish you the prosperity that allows you more time to pursue the salt water dream, and the true happiness that comes from warm water, clean waves and the companionship of your fellow surfers. If you are an internet troll just spewing bs then f off.

Just because a text message isn't anti-Trump, doesn't necessarily make it pro-Trump. Have you seen the text messages that Horowitz was referring to? Try comparing those to the ones Strzok wrote. They sound just like observations to me.

Agent 1: "Trump!"
Agent 2: "Hahaha. S--- just got real,"
Agent 1: "Yes it did,"
Agent 2: "I saw a lot of scared MFers on ... [my way to work] this morning. Start looking for new jobs fellas. Haha."

You don't have to be a Trump supporter to know that everyone in Washington expected Hillary was going to win. Of course there were a lot of scared people in Washington when they realized there was about to be an unexpected changing of the guard.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

Remember when you said it wasn't illegal to reveal the ID of the whistle blower? Lolol Snipes, you are done here. Move along.

The whole thing is just another Trump lie that the Right media continues to run with. Not to mention that Barr is Trump attorney more than he is the AG.

How many of you clowns banged on the Deep State drum? All of you?

Discrediting your factual accusers, just another page from the Goebbels handbook.

-------------------------
I was right.

Agent 2: "I saw a lot of scared MFers on ... [my way to work] this morning. Start looking for new jobs fellas. Haha..... ON MY WAY TO WORK, AT the FBI, I saw a lot of scared MFers... Why would people going to work at the FBI be scared of Trump winning the Presidency??? Unless they were working to undermine/ spy on his campaign before the Election... Then he says, 'START LOOKING FOR NEW JOBS" because those scared people were going to get busted when the Truth comes out...

-------------------------

The same thing was said when Capone moved into a new neighborhood.



-------------------------
I was right.

BULLSHIT!

Capone's new neighbors felt SAFE....cause they KNEW no shit was going to happen there!




-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

You have absolutely no clue of the context of that text conversation, do you?

You do know those are pro-Trump FBI agents, right?

We reviewed the text and instant messages sent and received by the Handling Agent, the co-case Handling Agent, and the SSA for this CHS, which reflect their support for Trump in the 2016 elections. On November 9, the day after the election, the SSA contacted another FBI employee via an instant messaging program to discuss some recent CHS reporting regarding the Clinton Foundation
and offered that "if you hear talk of a special prosecutor .. .! will volunteer to work [on] the Clinton Foundation." The SSA's November 9, 2016 instant messages also stated that he "was so elated with the election" and compared the election coverage to "watching a Superbowl comeback." The SSA explained this comment to the OIG by saying that he "fully expected Hillary Clinton to walk away with
the election. But as the returns [came] in ... it was just energizing to me to see .... [because] I didn't want a criminal to be in the White House."
On November 9, 2016, the Handling Agent and co-case Handling Agent for this CHS also discussed the results of the election in an instant message exchange that reads:
Handling Agent: "Trump!"
Co-Case Handling Agent: "Hahaha. Shit just got real."
Handling Agent: "Yes it did."
Co-Case Handling Agent: "I saw a lot of scared MFers on ... [my way to work] this
morning. Start looking for new jobs fellas. Haha."
Handling Agent: "LOL"
Co-Case Handling Agent: "Come January I'm going to just get a big bowl of popcorn
and sit back and watch."
Handling Agent: "That's hilarious!"


Nobody was scared to go to work. These guys were just Trump nuts joking about possible Clinton supporters and the election results, not being in trouble for investigating anyone.

Sniper is a grad A moron. Today revealed just how much of an idiot he is too.

Edited: 12/12/2019 at 12:22 PM by HAPDigital

Your polls are TAINTED!

They are biased!

They are FAKE!

FACT!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

arguing politics with people is the same as arguing religion with the ultra religious. #factsdontmatter

You mean arguing politics with Trump supporters that facts don't matter. They really do live in an odd fantasy land where all reality ceases to exist.

Had Obama asked for foreign help from Russia and Ukraine, the Republicans would have had him out of office. This isn't about facts, it's about team sports.

-------------------------
I was right.

Spot on Cole.

It's dotards that make up the team spots of the party. That's what I'm here to make fun of...


-------------------------
QOP = Terrorists
FK = Gay

in the current political environment, absolutely yes. not too shocking that the most blinded by religious hypocrisy are the same blinded by trump. maybe the conspiracy theorists are right about fluoride in the water supply, lol

Funny how you don't hear Pugs arguing the facts of the case. All they have is deflection and distraction.

-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

They got nuthin. The bulbous bloviator has painted them into a corner with lava based paint.

-------------------------
I was right.

The Trumpanzees are the same people who used to try to argue with us about religion- they live in their own fantasy world where reality and facts don't matter.


Same old song and dance.. different day, different topic, but still just as crazy as ever.




-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

Those are the faces of people who will ignore genocide.

-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

By all means the GOP should call the whistleblower during the Senate portion of the proceedings. It would be a public relations disaster for them but yes they should do it! uninformed curmudgeons like nobodyelse are twitlers fan base!

the uninformed and ignorant trump supporters dont bother me. it is those i know to be smart, knowledgeable, and successful that still support him despite all he has done that bother me

Wait there's G-men and women that support twitler? Doi

hey twitler supporters, please don't let reality (that is apparent to any normal person) get in the way of your idiotic narratives

Yall are a huge pile of MORONS!

http://m.washingtontimes.com/n...j1BpGnQzrnf1HsCrOxcd60

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Trump sent his attorney to Ukraine to get dirt on Biden for his re-election.
He held up bipartisan military aide to a country at war with an enemy of the US (but friend of trump)
He told them he "needed a favor" and asked them to investigate Biden
He insisted that the Ukraine president announce an investigation into Biden when that president wanted a meeting

It's all very clear to any impartial person what he was up to. And it's kind of fun watching you and the other waterboys do back flips trying to pretend that the truth is fake.

That said, trump controls the senate, so the ultimate outcome is foregone conclusion.
The impeachment is (as noted by Chapo Traphouse), a "busybox" for liberals.
He'll probably be re-elected, because the american system of government has failed. The sooner people realize that the better.


-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti