Hey Matt B ... How the hell o are you ??? :)

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Making Sense of Climate Change Denial
Topic Summary:
Created On: 04/22/2015 12:02 PM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/22/2015 12:02 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - tpapablo - 04/22/2015 01:17 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Wookie - 04/22/2015 01:22 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - theglide - 04/22/2015 01:43 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - theglide - 04/22/2015 02:11 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Wookie - 04/22/2015 03:18 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - eibla - 04/22/2015 05:50 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - tpapablo - 04/23/2015 06:58 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/23/2015 07:06 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Sniper - 04/23/2015 11:47 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - jdbman - 04/23/2015 11:57 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - scombrid - 04/23/2015 12:42 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - theglide - 04/23/2015 12:52 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/23/2015 01:13 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/23/2015 01:22 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - tpapablo - 04/23/2015 01:34 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Cole - 04/24/2015 04:11 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Sniper - 04/24/2015 05:33 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/24/2015 07:33 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - tpapablo - 04/24/2015 07:36 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Sniper - 04/24/2015 07:36 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - tpapablo - 04/24/2015 07:39 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Wookie - 04/24/2015 07:42 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - scombrid - 04/24/2015 08:27 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - worksuxgetsponsered - 04/24/2015 09:00 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/24/2015 10:17 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - WG - 04/24/2015 09:55 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - scombrid - 04/23/2015 12:38 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Sniper - 04/24/2015 05:28 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - scombrid - 04/24/2015 05:48 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - scombrid - 04/24/2015 06:04 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Wookie - 04/24/2015 07:17 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Sniper - 04/24/2015 07:34 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - eibla - 04/24/2015 10:00 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - Wookie - 04/25/2015 11:01 AM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - eibla - 04/25/2015 01:01 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - tpapablo - 04/25/2015 09:10 PM  
 Making Sense of Climate Change Denial   - eibla - 04/26/2015 05:11 AM  
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 04/22/2015 12:02 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

To further the work of educating the public, and empowering people to communicate the realities of climate change, the Skeptical Science team has collaborated with The University of Queensland to develop a MOOC, Making Sense of Climate Science Denial. MOOC stands for Massive (we've already had thousands of students sign up from over 130 countries) Open (available for free to everyone) Online (web-based, no software required) Course.

The course examines the science of climate science denial. Why do a small but vocal minority reject the scientific evidence for climate change? What techniques do they use to cast doubt on the science? And we examine the all-important question - based on scientific research, how should we respond to science denial?

youtube



Our MOOC starts next Tuesday, April 28. It's a free online course hosted by the not-for-profit edX (founded by Harvard University & MIT). It runs for 7 weeks, requiring 1 to 2 hours per week. You can enroll at http://edx.org/understanding-climate-denial.


-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill
 04/22/2015 01:17 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 44108
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

 04/22/2015 01:22 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Wookie

Posts: 2018
Joined Forum: 01/12/2015

What is saying the same thing over and over a sign of?



-------------------------

Wiki wiki

 04/22/2015 01:43 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


theglide

Posts: 9422
Joined Forum: 08/06/2003

Global warming....hahahaha.

Right now, I am in the shade and there is a nice cool breeze blowing.
 04/22/2015 02:11 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


theglide

Posts: 9422
Joined Forum: 08/06/2003

People, wake the frick up.

Climate change is a global conspiracy to make Al Gore rich.

Let me connect the dots for you block heads.

Numerous foreign countries have donated money to the Clinton foundation.

Therefore, the Clintons have significant influence over these countries, "global" influence.

Possibly enough to get them to fake climate statistics? (just sayin')

Who was VP when Clinton was president?

Al Gore.....Thank you.




 04/22/2015 03:18 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Wookie

Posts: 2018
Joined Forum: 01/12/2015

I hope you are being ironic.



-------------------------

Wiki wiki

 04/22/2015 05:50 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


eibla

Posts: 15316
Joined Forum: 07/30/2003

^^^^ Not ironic...just poking fun at wacky righty idiocy. Trying to paint people who agree with the science as cultists is the smear flavor of the month for them. Give it a week or so and they'll come up with something even more stupid.

-------------------------

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness -
John Kenneth Galbraith
 04/23/2015 06:58 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 44108
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

The cultists fight back, in a very predictable way. Good to see that some things don't change.



-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 04/23/2015 07:06 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, the "conservatives" stick to their delusions (or lies, I'm not really sure which of those camps your are really in).
Sad to see some things never change.


-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill
 04/23/2015 11:47 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8761
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Why can't the Chicken Littles of the world focus on campaigns that encourage citizens to do things that will help the environment in their day-to-day lives?

The reason people are skeptical is that every single possible solution to this problem, posed by the alarmists, stands to make certain people or groups billions of dollars off the backs of the American people. Whether the alarmists are suggesting legislation that makes power in our homes more expensive, makes it cost more to drive, or whether it involves controlling what kind of vehicle we drive, every solution the alarmists propose is aimed at taking control/money/power from one group and handing it to another.

THAT is why people are and should be skeptical of the legislation around global warming. I'm sure that many of the scientists involved mean well but we would be stupid to think that their aren't equally as many people looking at this as a power/money land grab and could care less about the science.

No knee jerk policy making needed.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden
 04/23/2015 11:57 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


jdbman

Posts: 12179
Joined Forum: 07/28/2003

No knee jerk policy making needed.


By the time a teabag/repug woke up it would be too late.

I continue to be amazed at the people who post on this here 2L surf forum that claim to be surfers. I just dont see how you can be a surfer and not have some concern for the environment. Unless you are just a brainwashed media punk.


How many surfed Cali in the mid 60s? What was that like? How many surfed in the late 70s? What was that like? Anyone notice any difference? How about the Texas Gulf Coast some time frames? Even here in CLFA. It aint the same. If you dont see the signs and dont take action then watch when the ocean turns to poo, and the shoreline recedes.

Its a living breathing planet and we contribute to what fucks it up.

-------------------------
So if you are a surfer I wish you the prosperity that allows you more time to pursue the salt water dream, and the true happiness that comes from warm water, clean waves and the companionship of your fellow surfers. If you are an internet troll just spewing bs then f off.
 04/23/2015 12:42 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18042
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Originally posted by: jdbman By the time a teabag/repug woke up it would be too late. I continue to be amazed at the people who post on this here 2L surf forum that claim to be surfers.

These were the same people that opposed catalytic converters on cars.

These were the same people that opposed cap and trade for sulfur.

These were the same people that opposed regulating CFCs.

These were the same people that screem bloody murder when they have to spend money to hook up to a municiple wastewater system.

These are the people that got Rick Scott to rescind the rule that would require people to get their septic tanks inspected on a regular basis.

Don't believe a word they say when they say they are for clean water and think that the "chicken littles" would not be opposed if they'd just make sensible solutions for voluntary means of environmental protection.



-------------------------
...

 04/23/2015 12:52 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


theglide

Posts: 9422
Joined Forum: 08/06/2003

Scombrid, I have two magic words for you:

THE FREE MARKET.
 04/23/2015 01:13 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

Bullshit sniper.
Who exactly to you think is going to get rich from mitigating climate change?


The real reason some people are skeptical is that every single possible solution to this problem, as defined by the science means that we can not safely burn a lot more fossil fuels.

Certain people who "own" the carbon in the ground and are currently making billions of dollars off the backs of the American people, will make a lot less.

All of those oil, gas and coal rights are now are worth a lot less.

Some very rich people stand to be a lot less rich than they thought they were.

This fact is the one that matters, the one that fuels the denial movement.



-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill
 04/23/2015 01:22 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

Dear Future Generations: Sorry

-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill

Edited: 04/24/2015 at 07:31 AM by WG
 04/23/2015 01:34 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 44108
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: WG Dear Future Generations: Sorry

Can't open the link. Maybe you progs should start apologizing for the trillions of dollars in debt you are leaving to future generations. That is real even. (I'd add that we will eventually be so broke that environmental concerns will go out the window and that, in turn, will degrade the environment. Progs screw up everything they touch, as has bween well documented.)

I continue to be amazed at the people who post on this here 2L surf forum that claim to be surfers. I just dont see how you can be a surfer and not have some concern for the environment. Unless you are just a brainwashed media punk.

Not all surfers are Jeff Spicolis. Some of us have a working brain between the ears.



-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 04/24/2015 04:11 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68516
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Some of us have a working brain between the ears.



You think Dubya was a great president. That pretty much shoots the above all to hell.

-------------------------
I was right.
 04/24/2015 05:33 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8761
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Originally posted by: jdbman
No knee jerk policy making needed.
Its a living breathing planet and we contribute to what fucks it up.


So, in your opinion, humans are Earth's cancer and the best thing we can do for our planet is to all go kill ourselves?

I don't think humans are horrible.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden
 04/24/2015 07:33 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

Originally posted by: Sniper

Originally posted by: jdbman

No knee jerk policy making needed.





Its a living breathing planet and we contribute to what fucks it up.





So, in your opinion, humans are Earth's cancer and the best thing we can do for our planet is to all go kill ourselves?



I don't think humans are horrible.


Just fucking amazing that you go there.




-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill
 04/24/2015 07:36 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 44108
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Fortunately, most Americans know a cult when they see one and haven't signed up for this one. Politically, we are in a position now to stop the worst of the idiotic ideas. Hopefully, we can put a competent person into the White House  in 2016 and put an end to this garbage.



-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 04/24/2015 07:36 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8761
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Originally posted by: WG
Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: jdbman
No knee jerk policy making needed.
Its a living breathing planet and we contribute to what fucks it up.
So, in your opinion, humans are Earth's cancer and the best thing we can do for our planet is to all go kill ourselves? I don't think humans are horrible.
Just fucking amazing that you go there.


Be shocked. Be appalled. Go ahead and give me a "oh, how dare you!" and see how many f's I give.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden
 04/24/2015 07:39 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 44108
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: WG
Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: jdbman
No knee jerk policy making needed.
Its a living breathing planet and we contribute to what fucks it up.
So, in your opinion, humans are Earth's cancer and the best thing we can do for our planet is to all go kill ourselves? I don't think humans are horrible.
Just fucking amazing that you go there.
Be shocked. Be appalled. Go ahead and give me a "oh, how dare you!" and see how many f's I give.

Cult members get a bit touchy when you question their beliefs.



-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 04/24/2015 07:42 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Wookie

Posts: 2018
Joined Forum: 01/12/2015

You care about something, Sniper.  It's just hard to tell what.

Tpap is not a mammal, so nothing bothers him.



-------------------------

Wiki wiki

 04/24/2015 08:27 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18042
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Originally posted by: Sniper So, in your opinion, humans are Earth's cancer and the best thing we can do for our planet is to all go kill ourselves? I don't think humans are horrible.

Someone says, "Hey let's not shit where we eat" and you come to that conclusion?

Strange.

 

 



-------------------------
...

 04/24/2015 09:00 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


worksuxgetsponsered

Posts: 8728
Joined Forum: 01/19/2005

Durham, NC - There may be a scientific answer for why conservatives and liberals disagree so vehemently over the existence of issues like climate change and specific types of crime.

A new study from Duke University finds that people will evaluate scientific evidence based on whether they view its policy implications as politically desirable. If they don't, then they tend to deny the problem even exists.

"Logically, the proposed solution to a problem, such as an increase in government regulation or an extension of the free market, should not influence one's belief in the problem. However, we find it does," said co-author Troy Campbell, a Ph.D. candidate at Duke's Fuqua School of Business. "The cure can be more immediately threatening than the problem."

The study, "Solution Aversion: On the Relation Between Ideology and Motivated Disbelief," appears in the November issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (viewable at http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/107/5/809/).

The researchers conducted three experiments (with samples ranging from 120 to 188 participants) on three different issues -- climate change, air pollution that harms lungs, and crime.

"The goal was to test, in a scientifically controlled manner, the question: Does the desirability of a solution affect beliefs in the existence of the associated problem? In other words, does what we call 'solution aversion' exist?" Campbell said.

"We found the answer is yes. And we found it occurs in response to some of the most common solutions for popularly discussed problems."

For climate change, the researchers conducted an experiment to examine why more Republicans than Democrats seem to deny its existence, despite strong scientific evidence that supports it.

One explanation, they found, may have more to do with conservatives' general opposition to the most popular solution -- increasing government regulation -- than with any difference in fear of the climate change problem itself, as some have proposed.

Participants in the experiment, including both self-identified Republicans and Democrats, read a statement asserting that global temperatures will rise 3.2 degrees in the 21st century. They were then asked to evaluate a proposed policy solution to address the warming.

When the policy solution emphasized a tax on carbon emissions or some other form of government regulation, which is generally opposed by Republican ideology, only 22 percent of Republicans said they believed the temperatures would rise at least as much as indicated by the scientific statement they read.

But when the proposed policy solution emphasized the free market, such as with innovative green technology, 55 percent of Republicans agreed with the scientific statement.

For Democrats, the same experiment recorded no difference in their belief, regardless of the proposed solution to climate change.

"Recognizing this effect is helpful because it allows researchers to predict not just what problems people will deny, but who will likely deny each problem," said co-author Aaron Kay, an associate professor at Fuqua. "The more threatening a solution is to a person, the more likely that person is to deny the problem."

The researchers found liberal-leaning individuals exhibited a similar aversion to solutions they viewed as politically undesirable in an experiment involving violent home break-ins. When the proposed solution called for looser versus tighter gun-control laws, those with more liberal gun-control ideologies were more likely to downplay the frequency of violent home break-ins.

"We should not just view some people or group as anti-science, anti-fact or hyper-scared of any problems," Kay said. "Instead, we should understand that certain problems have particular solutions that threaten some people and groups more than others. When we realize this, we understand those who deny the problem more and we improve our ability to better communicate with them."

Campbell added that solution aversion can help explain why political divides become so divisive and intractable.

"We argue that the political divide over many issues is just that, it's political," Campbell said. "These divides are not explained by just one party being more anti-science, but the fact that in general people deny facts that threaten their ideologies, left, right or center."

The researchers noted there are additional factors that can influence how people see the policy implications of science. Additional research using larger samples and more specific methods would provide an even clearer picture, they said.

The study was funded by The Fuqua School of Business. The full text of the article can be found here in Duke Space, the university's open-access repository of faculty research.


GO Duke

Kind of a no brainer, but an interesting read.

-------------------------
Specializing in sarcasm and condescending rhetoric since 1971.
 04/24/2015 10:17 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

"I don't see any examples of the global warming crowd trying to educate anyone. "
look harder

I've posted both of these basic intros manv times. I don't yet see any evidence that you or your fellow deniers have made the effort to learn the science.


Real Climate - start here

http://www.skepticalscience.co...arming-Skepticism.html

-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill
 04/24/2015 09:55 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


WG

Posts: 37257
Joined Forum: 03/10/2005

Conservative groups spend up to $1bn a year to fight action on climate change.
guardian

-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill
 04/23/2015 12:38 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18042
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Originally posted by: Sniper Why can't the Chicken Littles of the world focus on campaigns that encourage citizens to do things that will help the environment in their day-to-day lives?

Such as using less electricity or electricity from some source other than mercury and soot laden coal? Putting less fertilizer on their lawn? Driving more fuel efficient cars?

People just going to magically do that voluntarily with no garrantee that the other millions of people around them will reciprocate? Really?

People just go do the dealer and demand that their car have emission reduction devices right? The improvements in air quality all magically came from people voluntarily adding emission control devices to their cars and demanding low sulfur diesel for their highway trucks and autos.

And everybody is going to magically convert their lawns to native drought tolerate landscapes that don't require extra fertilizer and water in order to help restore the St. Johns River and IRL.



-------------------------
...

 04/24/2015 05:28 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8761
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Originally posted by: scombrid
Originally posted by: Sniper Why can't the Chicken Littles of the world focus on campaigns that encourage citizens to do things that will help the environment in their day-to-day lives?
Such as using less electricity or electricity from some source other than mercury and soot laden coal? Putting less fertilizer on their lawn? Driving more fuel efficient cars? People just going to magically do that voluntarily with no garrantee that the other millions of people around them will reciprocate? Really? People just go do the dealer and demand that their car have emission reduction devices right? The improvements in air quality all magically came from people voluntarily adding emission control devices to their cars and demanding low sulfur diesel for their highway trucks and autos. And everybody is going to magically convert their lawns to native drought tolerate landscapes that don't require extra fertilizer and water in order to help restore the St. Johns River and IRL.


Nobody is going to convert their lawns to native drought tolerant landscapes because it looks like shit.

And yes, with the right kinds of campaigns and education people will change their behavior.

What you said above is like saying, "How are we ever going to get the majority of people to stop littering on the beach?!" Most people don't.

You guys should find a way to sell your ideas through education instead of forcing them on people.

Again, it is the money and power involved that makes people skeptical and nervous about the intentions of the pushers.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden

Edited: 04/24/2015 at 05:34 AM by Sniper
 04/24/2015 05:48 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18042
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Originally posted by: Sniper Nobody is going to convert their lawns to native drought tolerant landscapes because it looks like shit.

It looks good when done right and can be lower cost than long term maintenance of that St. Augustine lawn. But it is more work than paying a lawn service to come out and mow and spray and mow and spray while you go play somewhere.

So we have people putting their personal self interest above that of the commons. Which is what always happens which is why rules to protect the commons generally have to be mandatory.

IRL and SJR and all of the pea-soup green lakes will stay nasty unless there is some really push to reduce nutrient loads. This little bullshit of sucking some muck out of a canal here and there is not going to restore decent water quality in the places where people say that they want better water quality.

And yes, with the right kinds of campaigns and education people will change their behavior.

Not really. Some people will pay the higher price for the environmentally clean product. You know what happens when a subset of people buy the environmentally friendly product even though it is more expensive? That reduces the price of the polluting product. Then demand for the cheaper product goes up. That way the people that buy the "cleaner" product end up paying a higher price but receive ZERO environmental benefit because every unit reduction that they create by their action is matched by the the unit increase by the rest of consumers. The average rational actor always defects. Price pressure always encourages the producer to externalize as much cost as possible, especially when the pollution is not dumping right onto their property.



-------------------------
...

 04/24/2015 06:04 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18042
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Originally posted by: Sniper What you said above is like saying, "How are we ever going to get the majority of people to stop littering on the beach?!"

Littering isn't illegal or anything.

And I still pick up trash every week at the end of my street where I access the lagoon. And ground around around the bench at Valencia Dock is covered with cigarette butts. And there's that guy with the golden retriever that flings the shit into the lagoon when he walks Rockledge Drive instead of doing like the rest of use and picking it up in a bag. And some asshole less his dog shit in my front yard and doesn't pick it up.

And littering is materially different than a lot of pollution forms that are remote to the people contributing to the pollution. Pollution from coal fired power plants isn't sitting on top of the sand right in your play ground. No, it is downwind and downstream of a mine sight in Appalachia, a mine site that you will likely never see even if you go to Snowshoe to ski.  The pollution from the coal fired plant is invisible in the fish that people eat and the effects from that are slow to accumulate.

The pollution from cars is distributed and often generally invisible. You can't really see ozone and everybody isn't sensitive so EPA stating that reducing Ozone by Y percent will result in X fewer asthma attacks is intangible to the average person that is deciding what car to buy. Hell even in places where smog is so bad that you can taste the air (we don't get that in FL generally) people don't associate the haze with the stuff coming out of their car. So the cost of emission control was resisted by the average consumer and had to be mandated.

 



-------------------------
...

 04/24/2015 07:17 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Wookie

Posts: 2018
Joined Forum: 01/12/2015

Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: scombrid
Originally posted by: Sniper Why can't the Chicken Littles of the world focus on campaigns that encourage citizens to do things that will help the environment in their day-to-day lives?
Such as using less electricity or electricity from some source other than mercury and soot laden coal? Putting less fertilizer on their lawn? Driving more fuel efficient cars? People just going to magically do that voluntarily with no garrantee that the other millions of people around them will reciprocate? Really? People just go do the dealer and demand that their car have emission reduction devices right? The improvements in air quality all magically came from people voluntarily adding emission control devices to their cars and demanding low sulfur diesel for their highway trucks and autos. And everybody is going to magically convert their lawns to native drought tolerate landscapes that don't require extra fertilizer and water in order to help restore the St. Johns River and IRL.
Nobody is going to convert their lawns to native drought tolerant landscapes because it looks like shit. And yes, with the right kinds of campaigns and education people will change their behavior. What you said above is like saying, "How are we ever going to get the majority of people to stop littering on the beach?!" Most people don't. You guys should find a way to sell your ideas through education instead of forcing them on people. Again, it is the money and power involved that makes people skeptical and nervous about the intentions of the pushers.

Total BS.  It's the direness of the predictions and the fact that it may involve sacrifice that creates denial.  That along with the f#cking tidal wave of propaganda from the fossil fuel industry, a literal juggernaut of money and power.  I mean, how can that not be clear?

'Oh Science, you are too harsh.  The stories you tell, they must be sugar coated and "sold"'.  What crap; science tells the truth; life ain't fair; man up.



-------------------------

Wiki wiki

 04/24/2015 07:34 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Sniper

Posts: 8761
Joined Forum: 09/24/2003

Originally posted by: Wookie
Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: scombrid
Originally posted by: Sniper Why can't the Chicken Littles of the world focus on campaigns that encourage citizens to do things that will help the environment in their day-to-day lives?
Such as using less electricity or electricity from some source other than mercury and soot laden coal? Putting less fertilizer on their lawn? Driving more fuel efficient cars? People just going to magically do that voluntarily with no garrantee that the other millions of people around them will reciprocate? Really? People just go do the dealer and demand that their car have emission reduction devices right? The improvements in air quality all magically came from people voluntarily adding emission control devices to their cars and demanding low sulfur diesel for their highway trucks and autos. And everybody is going to magically convert their lawns to native drought tolerate landscapes that don't require extra fertilizer and water in order to help restore the St. Johns River and IRL.
Nobody is going to convert their lawns to native drought tolerant landscapes because it looks like shit. And yes, with the right kinds of campaigns and education people will change their behavior. What you said above is like saying, "How are we ever going to get the majority of people to stop littering on the beach?!" Most people don't. You guys should find a way to sell your ideas through education instead of forcing them on people. Again, it is the money and power involved that makes people skeptical and nervous about the intentions of the pushers.

Total BS.  It's the direness of the predictions and the fact that it may involve sacrifice that creates denial.  That along with the f#cking tidal wave of propaganda from the fossil fuel industry, a literal juggernaut of money and power.  I mean, how can that not be clear?

'Oh Science, you are too harsh.  The stories you tell, they must be sugar coated and "sold"'.  What crap; science tells the truth; life ain't fair; man up.



Where is all this propaganda you speak of?

I don't see any examples of the global warming crowd trying to educate anyone.

All they do is call people who are unsure or who don't agree with them stupid or "deniers".

First of all, calling someone a "denier" sounds fucking cultish and creepy. Second, do you think that is any way to go about changing anyone's mind?

The movie from Algore doesn't count.

People want to hear honest debate from people who actually know what they are talking about, so they can make up their minds for themselves but for whatever reason, that doesn't exist on this topic.

Just a bunch of people regurgitating what other people say, like they do on this forum.

-------------------------
"The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul," - George Bernard Shaw

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f—k things up.” - Barack Obama

“End of quote. Repeat the line.” - wise words from Joe Biden
 04/24/2015 10:00 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


eibla

Posts: 15316
Joined Forum: 07/30/2003

Conservatics apparently don't believe in science yet they reap the benefits of it every day.

-------------------------

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness -
John Kenneth Galbraith
 04/25/2015 11:01 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Wookie

Posts: 2018
Joined Forum: 01/12/2015

As long as it's industrial science it's okay.  Science is meant to be applied; to hell with the search for objective truth, right?



-------------------------

Wiki wiki

 04/25/2015 01:01 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


eibla

Posts: 15316
Joined Forum: 07/30/2003

When behavior by certain humans cause our environment to become unlivable then yes, they are a cancer.

-------------------------

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness -
John Kenneth Galbraith
 04/25/2015 09:10 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 44108
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Exactly, eibla. Progs are a cancer and must be exterminated. 



-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 04/26/2015 05:11 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


eibla

Posts: 15316
Joined Forum: 07/30/2003

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Exactly, eibla. Progs are a cancer and must be exterminated. 



We're not the one's denying the science.

-------------------------

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness -
John Kenneth Galbraith
Statistics
146500 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 5 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

First there was Air Jordan .