Anti-Trump Judges Accidentally Made Obama's Contraceptive Mandate UNCONSTITUTIONAL
March 23, 2017| by V. Saxena

Last week a couple liberal activist judges unwittingly screwed themselves and their Democrat peers over by ruling against President Donald Trump's second moratorium.

Conservative Tribune offers some background:
As noted by National Review writer David French, the ruling [last] Wednesday by U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson "used the hurt feelings (yes, really) of American residents and the hypothetical economic harm to American states and local institutions to functionally grant constitutional rights to tens of millions of non-Americans living in jihadist, and jihad-dominated, countries."

To make matters worse, Watson's ruling was reportedly not based on Trump's actual executive order, but rather on allegedly offensive remarks the then-GOP presidential nominee made about Muslims on the campaign trail last year - before he even became president.
The idea basically was that Trump speaking negatively about Muslims was enough to prove that his executive order - which did not even mention Muslims - was racist and bigoted.
Maryland-based U.S. District Judge Theodore D. Chuang issued a similar ruling later in the week.

According to American Thinker contributor Tom Trinko, these rulings were based on the premise "that anything that has a desperate impact on a religious group is constitutional."

Here's the kicker: The exact same premise can easily be applied to a number of conservative causes, including the one focused on undoing former President Barack Obama's draconian contraceptive mandate.

"Clearly since many religious groups believe that contraception and abortion are morally licit while the Catholic Church, and some Protestant denominations, believe that contraception and abortion are not morally licit any EO/law that requires funding contraception and abortion will have a disparate impact on Catholics since it forces them to violate their deeply held religious beliefs," Trinko wrote.

"Further, even if liberals argue that the HHS mandate is not discriminatory on its face all conservatives have to do is show that anyone involved in generating it ever said anything negative about the Church's stance on abortion to meet the criteria set by the activist judges."

"After all the liberal judges admitted that Trump's EO itself is not discriminatory but that because Trump supposedly said discriminatory things during the campaign the EO is unconstitutional."

Check and mate, liberal scumbags!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Should I be forced to financially cover your "birth control"? No. Period. "Birth control" is a personal choice.

-------------------------
Dora Hates You

Youre right- its much cheaper to force you guys to cover all the extra births, c-sections, endless child health care...


Because having a baby is cheap!



-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

http://www.zoodles.com/free-on...hool_logic--reasoning/

Abortions are relatively cheap and are certainly effective.

-------------------------
Dora Hates You

Fat one posted it no link. FAKE NEWS!

-------------------------
I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I noticed it always coincides with their own desires

Susan B. Anthony
1896

Impeach Trump

Ok so for the record- Dingpatch would rather all American females have sex and get pregnant, then go ahead and have abortions instead of using birth control. Got it. Makes alot of sense.

Hope you dont have any daughters or granddaughters..

-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

You chumpf swine seem to forget about the woman who has to confront her conscience, and her faith, in a decision about whether to keep a child. Or not.
It is her, and only her who is qualified to make that decision, and live with it thru life.
You misogynist so called "christian conservatives" think you have the right to interfere with her her quite frankly terrible decision. No woman makes it on a whim, they have to live with it, and i guarantee they seek counsel with church family and friends. And proceed for what they find compelling reasons
Separation of church and state is wisely and rightly enshrined in our utterly world changing constitution
You chumpf bannon scum think you can walk all over it.
Pilchard Swallower finds that decision amusing.................
duuuuhhhhhh......

-------------------------
It's a democratic hoax

Edited: 03/26/2017 at 03:00 PM by nukeh2o

NOBODY has the right to terminate a human in the womb!

NOBODY!

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Tell that to Dingpatch padre.. he's all for em as a penny saver..

-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

blub blub blub Pigfish Sodomite gilligan. whats your foolish useless phrases?
FOOL. LIAR. EVIL GODLESS CHUMPF SCUM!
YOU as a chumpf fuckn, blightbart lickin, MILO! loving useless dirt: have zero moral or ethical credibility. Sit down, shut up, wise up. And get out of the fucking way dork.
As i clearly stated dufus: its none of your, or your evil infowar, "so called christian conservatives" fucking business. period. In any way shape or form.
Its between her, her other who created the birth with her. . Her family, her friends, her religious advisor.
And her conscience. And her maker.
And she will make her own decision.......
but none of your ignorant foolish business.
PERIOD, LOSER!
duuuuhhhhhh.......

-------------------------
It's a democratic hoax

Edited: 03/26/2017 at 04:50 PM by nukeh2o

Then, again, , , , what does ", , , , the woman who has to confront her conscience, and her faith, in a decision about whether to keep a child. Or not, , , ," have to do with me not paying for someone else's birth control?

Just like everything else in this life, , , , if you want to play, you've got to pay, , , , ,.

-------------------------
Dora Hates You

Why do I have to pay for your Senile Dementia?

-------------------------


Zzzzzzz.. Zzzzzzz.. Braaaaaapp!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz....

Sounds like someone wants to force their religious beliefs on the free people of this country.

The Christian right are looking a lot like the Muslims that they hate so much...



-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project

Anybody that has a womb has the right to decide what to do with it.
ANYBODY THAT HAS ONE.

-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill

Agree, maybe start a one or two child policy like CHINA, and steralize LOL:

As part of the policy, women were required to have a contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) surgically installed after having a first child, and to be sterilized by tubal ligation after having a second child. From 1980 to 2014, 324 million Chinese women were fitted with IUDs in this way and 107 million were sterilized. Women who refused these procedures - which many resented - could lose their government employment and their children could lose access to education or health services. The IUDs installed in this way were modified such that they could not be removed manually, but only through surgery. In 2016, following the abolition of the one-child policy, the Chinese government announced that IUD removals would now be paid for by the government.(wiki)

-------------------------
I troll 2L.com to be a better person in real life

how is that agreement?

(or did I miss sarcasm?)

-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill

Indeed. They are fighting over who gets to control society rather than the nature of the control.

Except that the left side has a bit of power in America, the right side has none.
No fight at all really.


-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill

Yes.

I meant in the abstract.