No, I think he is just directly refering to the common knowledge that people who have lived long lives with sticks up their asses regarding "race" probably face some consequences in the personal comfort area.

-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill

Edited: 10/18/2017 at 10:02 AM by WG

So BLM is an example of some angry people who were vandalizing, burning, and looting but then organized to give up that tactic for nonviolent protest and finally got the public to listen?

I was not aware of this history.
Show me this.

edit-
maybe I read that wrong.
Are you saying that the people who were looting burning and vandalizing (past tense) are the very same people who now support the peaceful movement?

is either of those a negative?


-------------------------
"The truth is incontrovertible.
malice may attack it,
ignorance may deride it,
but in the end,
there it is." -Sir Winston Churchill

It's not about you Mike. Watch or don't, nobody cares.


-------------------------
Capitalism is based on the ridiculous notion that you can enjoy limitless growth in a closed, finite system.

In biology, such behavior of cells is called "cancer".

Well I guess this topic doesn't matter anymore. Ya'll are going to have to put up with it from here on out.

"NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, NFL team owners, players and others met Tuesday to discuss recent issues and tensions over kneeling during the national anthem. The end result? Players can still take a knee without getting penalized. Of course this isn't sitting well with Donald Trump. Even though there is a lot going on in the world... he tweeted about it bright and early today saying, "The NFL has decided that it will not force players to stand for the playing of our National Anthem. Total disrespect for our great country!""

I'd bet the NFL and the teams lose no ratings whatsoever. 'Merica loves its football.

Respect for the country.

 

He's in a hangar so no requirement to stop and pay respect.

But damn. He's joking about the Retreat.

So he's either glibly joking about it or he, the Commander in Chief, didn't know what he was hearing.

Wow.

 

 

-------------------------
...

NFL: We are calling attention to unarmed black men being shot down in the streets by the very authority charged with protecting their lives.

White People: Why do you hate the military?

Hahahahahahah!

That BULLSHIT will happen right up until Goodell and the OWNERS lose a boatload of cash....ie: millions from their OWN pockets.

Then things will take a serious abrupt 180.

FACT!

That day is coming very soon.



-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

You have a serious wannabes syndrome

That would make you guys perfect assholes .Alrighty then

Nah, no footbal fanatic is going to skip watching their favorite manly game because of some dude takin a knee. If they did, they know they'd be considered a snowflake sissy boy. Plus you can't kill addiction with takin a knee. Sports addicts will be sports addicts, something to talk about on ESPN pre game and post game shows.

If everybody's so upset about the players standing up for a cause, what's up with all the pink for breast cancer awareness.

It's a cause. It's a popular cause, because, boobies, but hey.

The NFL isn't a stranger to causes.

Maybe they should stand up for that cause then.

Step 2;

http://www.oann.com/conservatives-in-congress-act-to-end-nfl-subsidies-following-protests/

-------------------------
Romans 8;18-32 John 3;16-18

One white american news network looks pretty cool.

What's so disrespectful about taking a knee? It's not the finger. It's not turning their backs to the flag. It's not shouting over the anthem. It's not vandalizing the flag or flag pole. It's not walking out. It's not hurting anyone. Standing during the anthem, like you say, would just be hidden. That's exactly where white people want this protest, hidden. Ultimately they're kneeling because white people don't listen, and the white argument is that the people taking a knee hate the military. That's literally the argument. So ridiculous. We know that's not the case because the military fights for the rights of civilians. Protesting actually honors the constitution and the military that protects it. Service members swear to uphold the constitution. It's the very first thing they do. So the military argument is a moot point. The more they argue the knee taking the more it is apparent they are ignoring the oppressed. But now it's gone so far beyond ignorance, it's blatant hate IMO. Luckily the NFL leaders see it for what it is and support their players. Now the owners of the private organizations have spoken out about how they will run their business. The argument that the players need to follow rules is over too. They are allowed to kneel. Fans can boycott it if they want, but it is their hang up now as it has become a legit part of the game.

So you're a fan of socialism after all.

So einstein, removing subsidies from the NFL is socialist?

Hitting the bong early again!

-------------------------
Romans 8;18-32 John 3;16-18

No, knucklehead, subsidies for the NFL are and always have been socialism. You're posting that because you see it is a negative of the knee taking so therefore you are for it. Hence you are for socialism. Unless you posted it because you are glad to see it possibly go. I don't see you doing that that though. You posted it to show a possible consequence. Therefore you're a fan of socialism. As for the bong, I don't do any drugs especially pot. I hate smoke of all forms, you're wrong again.

Boy, if I had posted that idiocy, I sure wouldn't have admitted that I didn't use drugs.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Another unfounded statement, just because you don't like it. Sports subsidies are in fact socialism just like our military is. Posting a link saying that the government will take away said subsidies to prove a point means the OP has some attachment to socialism, otherwise they would not post it. But since you are so "smart" please explain the idiocy here. I'll bet you will avoid this question and you'll dissapear until it is way back into the thread, like you always do. hahaha