http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/illegal-voters-uncovered-philly-just-tip-iceberg/

Oh boy. Might the progs be wrong that there is absolutely no voter fraud taking place in the U.S.? Of course they are. They have never been right on anything.

And look at this:

According to the report, 59 of the ineligible voters were Democrats, six were Republicans, and 21 were members of minor parties or unaffiliated.

Could that be the reason that progs claim that there is no illegal voting in the U.S.? Me thinks it is.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

More, or should I say, mas.

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/bombshell-1000-illegal-votes-cast-eight-virginia-localities/

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

"Requests by the ineligible voters to be removed from the rolls included those who indicated that they had mistakenly marked boxes indicating that they were eligible voters when applying for driver's licenses. In some instances, voters marked "no" on the forms but got voter registration cards anyway. In another case, a voter indicated that he had been on the rolls for the previous five years despite repeated efforts to be removed."

That's not voter fraud, that's clerical error. Statistically insignificant, and bought and paid for by those who wish to cast dispersions upon democracy.

-------------------------
“It is the heart of US policy to use fascism to preserve capitalism while claiming to be saving democracy from communism “ - Michael Parenti

So Tpap, what does the Constitution say about voter ID?


-------------------------
I was right.

Once again, it left it to the states.

The progs cannot admit to voting fraud because it destroys their narrative that voting laws are racist. So, I could post  one million instances of documented voter fraud and they will still deny it. But as my posts show, it is going on on a large scale.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

You could post actual statistics that show that there are fewer than 50 confirmed cases of voter fraud in over 1 billion votes cast.

But we all know you have no plans on doing that.

-------------------------
I was right.

'it is left it to the states.' - tpuppet

We had ID in the 18th century?

-------------------------
I was right.

Yet more non-existent voter fraud.

http://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2016/10/04/state-police-raid-indy-office-growing-voter-fraud-case/91540816/

And it is looking more and more like progs are idiots.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Read the Constitution. That might help you understand.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Quite familiar with it, but what I don't understand is why it is variable when it comes to voting, you know, the whole states rights thing, but absolutely unbending when it comes to the second amendment?

-------------------------
I was right.

It is not variable when it comes to voting. Gives states the right to determine the nuts and bolts of voting.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Then shouldn't the states be able to dictate firearm policy?

-------------------------
I was right.

You just said you are quite familiar with the Constitution?

Yes, well regulated militias are permitted to have firearms.

As far as voting, how is the following any different then the second?

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, section 2.

But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

-------------------------
I was right.

If the states choose who can vote, why can't states have their own firearm laws?

-------------------------
I was right.

They can, but only so far as they don't violate the 2nd Amendment, which trumps state law in that area.

Same is true with the 14th Amendment, which will trump state voting laws.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Supreme Court has clarified this for you twice in the past decade.

http://nypost.com/2016/10/11/elections-official-caught-on-video-blasting-de-blasios-id-program/

Damn, here is a crime that went from nonexistent just two short weeks ago to one that is an epidemic now. Isn't that crazy?

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

They didn't "clarify it" for him, they ruled on it.

You know that there was a different "clarification" in the 20th century?

The current ruling does not equal truth. Roe v Wade could be overturned and Citizens United sure as hell should be.

Oh goodness. Still more of the nonexistent crime.

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/10/11/cbs4-investigation-reveals-another-dead-voter-fraud-cases-and-gaps/

 

-------------------------
I :heart; Q