Coastal Kitchen...trucken good food!

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Vitamins may lead to earlier death... - who knew?
Topic Summary: yes - another vitamin article
Created On: 04/16/2012 07:11 AM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
1 2 Next Last unread
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 04/16/2012 07:11 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

may be worth paying attention to? may be not. after all, it was done in Finland.... but it DID make it to the Archives of Internal Medicine (a fairly reputable publication). Do vitamins lead to earlier death?

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 07:14 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Since this was reposted, I am going to repost my response.

 

That article is total junk science for several reason.If you want to educate yourself on health living, lifestyle, and get some REAL science on supplementation, this is a good place to start: http://www.longecity.org/forum/

 

Also, not all vitamins are created equal, most minerals arent needed, and supplements CANNOT be grouped together with one another ever in a generalization.

 

For example, Iron is almost never needed under any circumstance for a male or post menopausal female. In fact, given how many foods are fortified with it, most men could probably stand to use a chelator nightly like IP6 to stop long term accumulation.

Vitamin D3 ...too low increases all cause mortality ....so does too high. Complete bell curve effect. Proper D3 levels are more importan than cholesterol.

Magnesium ....HUGE to supplement if deficient.

Folic Acid ...given the amount of fortified foods, unless you are tested to be deficient or currently pregnant. Can increase cancer risk significantly.

Metformin (French Lilac) - even non type 2 diabetics would benefit from this drug. Decreases all cause mortality, increases healthspan, and drastically reduces risk of certain cancers.

Aspirin - 81 mg (baby aspirin) decreases all cause mortality when taken daily over a long time span. Drastically reduces cancer risk.

Zinc/Copper - Gotta be careful with this because they influence each other. High zinc = low copper and vice versa. Too much or too little of either causes significant health problems.

 

I really love 'Vitamin E' studies. Vitamin E isn't -a- vitamin. There are several different E's that all act independently from one another and have a completely different impact on the body. Most studies are done using the cheapest and bad form of Vitamin E (alpha tocopherol) which actually reduces levels of the gamma E's in your system which is detrimental to your health. The other E's have the exact opposit effect found in many of the negative studies.

 

I can go on and on and on. My point is dont bother paying attention to the stupid articles generalizing supplementation because they are almost all junk science and incorrectly drawn conclusions.


 



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 07:17 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Aspirin started out as a  natural extract and has saved millions of lives.

French Lilac extract is the drug Metformin which has saved millions of lives.

 

Each and every single supplement, mineral, and vitamin acts differently in the body. Hell, even different forms of the 'same' supplement act differently in the body. They cannot ever be generalized our brought under a single commonality or summary.

 



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 07:19 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

Originally posted by: RiddleMe Since this was reposted, I am going to repost my response.  
and when was it first posted here? I also included disclaimers, thanks. Archives of Internal med IS considered a real scientific source, btw.

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 07:20 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Sorry if I am on a bit of a soap box here, but articles like this are extremely harmful because most people look at the summary without delving into the facts.

Like yea, no shit if you take a supplement with a heavy mineral like iron above what your body needs its going to cause problems (and a TON of them).



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 07:21 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Originally posted by: bob3000
Originally posted by: RiddleMe Since this was reposted, I am going to repost my response.

 

 

and when was it first posted here? I also included disclaimers, thanks.

 

http://www.2ndlight.com/fusetalk/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=4&threadid=137142&enterthread=y

 

Not that I expected you to see it buried in another topic.



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 07:23 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

your reply may be a re-post, but I believe my topic is the first. and yes, i saw it. thanks.

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 07:43 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Originally posted by: bob3000 your reply may be a re-post, but I believe my topic is the first. and yes, i saw it. thanks.

First actual topic yes.

 



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 07:55 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

Originally posted by: RiddleMe
Originally posted by: bob3000 your reply may be a re-post, but I believe my topic is the first. and yes, i saw it. thanks.
First actual topic yes.  
in that case, the first sentence in your re-post does not apply to THIS topic. cheers, B3K

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 07:55 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 18488
Joined: 07/25/2003

Ah, what to believe? Guess, since I am going to die in any event, I ain't going to worry about it. Instead, I'll devote my energies to trying to have a good life, however long it may be.



-------------------------

Brujo, gdudewe, martinA and WG - the white Al Sharptons of NSR.

 04/16/2012 07:56 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo Ah, what to believe? Guess, since I am going to die in any event, I ain't going to worry about it. Instead, I'll devote my energies to trying to have a good life, however long it may be.

5/5, Tpap!

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 08:37 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Originally posted by: tpapablo Ah, what to believe? Guess, since I am going to die in any event, I ain't going to worry about it. Instead, I'll devote my energies to trying to have a good life, however long it may be.

 

The technology is going to exist with this half of the century (roughly) to extend human lifespan (and healthspan) infinitely. Death outside of accidental cause will be a choice. The question is whether or not it will happen before or after you die.

A sane choice would be to use some of your energies atleast to promote earlier advances of this technology so you might benefit from it.

 

Or course that would also involve keeping religious nutjobs from influencing policy and funding with their religious beliefs as well as diminishing big pharma's influence over policy as well. Luckily we arent the only country doing research.



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi



Edited: 04/16/2012 at 08:45 AM by RiddleMe
 04/16/2012 09:35 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

Originally posted by: RiddleMe Sorry if I am on a bit of a soap box here, but articles like this are extremely harmful because most people look at the summary without delving into the facts.

1. yes, you're on a soap box!!LOL & 2. articles like this are NOT harmful AT ALL, if you post disclaimers in them, and cite your sources. discuss,

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 10:13 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Originally posted by: bob3000
Originally posted by: RiddleMe Sorry if I am on a bit of a soap box here, but articles like this are extremely harmful because most people look at the summary without delving into the facts.

 

1. yes, you're on a soap box!!LOL & 2. articles like this are NOT harmful AT ALL, if you post disclaimers in them, and cite your sources. discuss,

 

I disagree with #2 Bob. I would agree with you if most people had the time and knowledge to read full research papers and interpret them correctly. The truth is that the vast majority of people are lacking in one or both of those things. They will be mislead.



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 10:44 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

Originally posted by: RiddleMe I disagree with #2 Bob. I would agree with you if most people had the time and knowledge to read full research papers and interpret them correctly. The truth is that the vast majority of people are lacking in one or both of those things. They will be mislead.
that is precisely WHY i included my source, and disclaimer.... & you may continue, but you're beating a dead horse...it would more prudent if YOU edited your first reply on this, which actually refers to a different topic. thanks.

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 10:45 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 18488
Joined: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: RiddleMe
Originally posted by: tpapablo Ah, what to believe? Guess, since I am going to die in any event, I ain't going to worry about it. Instead, I'll devote my energies to trying to have a good life, however long it may be.

 

The technology is going to exist with this half of the century (roughly) to extend human lifespan (and healthspan) infinitely. Death outside of accidental cause will be a choice. The question is whether or not it will happen before or after you die.

A sane choice would be to use some of your energies atleast to promote earlier advances of this technology so you might benefit from it.

That's a depressing thought. I don't want to live forever.



-------------------------

Brujo, gdudewe, martinA and WG - the white Al Sharptons of NSR.

 04/16/2012 10:47 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Originally posted by: bob3000
Originally posted by: RiddleMe I disagree with #2 Bob. I would agree with you if most people had the time and knowledge to read full research papers and interpret them correctly. The truth is that the vast majority of people are lacking in one or both of those things. They will be mislead.
that is precisely WHY i included my source, and disclaimer.... & you may continue, but you're beating a dead horse...it would more prudent if YOU edited your first reply on this, which actually refers to a different topic. thanks.

Beating a dead horse is far more humane than beating a live one.



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 10:50 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RiddleMe

Posts: 1701
Joined: 07/21/2011

Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: RiddleMe
Originally posted by: tpapablo Ah, what to believe? Guess, since I am going to die in any event, I ain't going to worry about it. Instead, I'll devote my energies to trying to have a good life, however long it may be.

 

 

 

The technology is going to exist with this half of the century (roughly) to extend human lifespan (and healthspan) infinitely. Death outside of accidental cause will be a choice. The question is whether or not it will happen before or after you die.

 

A sane choice would be to use some of your energies atleast to promote earlier advances of this technology so you might benefit from it.

 

 

That's a depressing thought. I don't want to live forever.

 

Better to die strong, healthy, full of vigor, and on your OWN terms when you are ready ...rather than slowly wasting away over time, having your body ravaged by age, and perhaps leaving before you are ready to.

Nobody says you HAVE to live forever. So no need for depression.

 



-------------------------

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi

 04/16/2012 10:51 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


bob3000

Posts: 12614
Joined: 07/13/2004

Originally posted by: RiddleMe Beating a dead horse is far more humane than beating a live one.

on that much, we can probably agree!

-------------------------
And Bob will ALWAYS be my numero uno. -Tiffanys
 04/16/2012 11:31 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 18488
Joined: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: RiddleMe
Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: RiddleMe
Originally posted by: tpapablo Ah, what to believe? Guess, since I am going to die in any event, I ain't going to worry about it. Instead, I'll devote my energies to trying to have a good life, however long it may be.

 

 

 

The technology is going to exist with this half of the century (roughly) to extend human lifespan (and healthspan) infinitely. Death outside of accidental cause will be a choice. The question is whether or not it will happen before or after you die.

 

A sane choice would be to use some of your energies atleast to promote earlier advances of this technology so you might benefit from it.

 

 

That's a depressing thought. I don't want to live forever.

 

Better to die strong, healthy, full of vigor, and on your OWN terms when you are ready ...rather than slowly wasting away over time, having your body ravaged by age, and perhaps leaving before you are ready to.

Nobody says you HAVE to live forever. So no need for depression.

 

That's my intention.



-------------------------

Brujo, gdudewe, martinA and WG - the white Al Sharptons of NSR.

Statistics
76321 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 0 users logged in.

FuseTalk Basic Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

dust.resin.water...... Get your copy from http://dustresinwater.com/