
![]() |
2nd Light Forums | ![]() |
|
join :
help :
calendar :
home
|
||
|
Latest News:
|
latest topics : statistics | |


|
Topic Title: Sharpton in Sanford Topic Summary: Created On: 03/23/2012 06:13 AM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
|
Topic Tools
|
|
|
||
|
Did you watch him on TV yesterday? I am getting sick and tired of Sharpton turning everything into an Us vs Them situation.
------------------------- "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
"He has to prove his innocence."
------------------------- Who is Keyser Soze? |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sharpton is every bit of a racist fuck as the people he goes after. He is an absolute hypocritical piece of shit, because to him racism only applies in one direction.
I repeat, Zimmerman has a muti-ethnic family ....who is the 'them' he keeps referring to? The german/jewish, hispanic, or african american portion of Zimmerman's family? ------------------------- "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mohandas K Gandhi |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
It's a party, don't ya know. What, you don't want to let black folks party? You a racist, boy? |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once people like Sharpton and Jackson get involved it becomes theater. That is their shtick, whatever.
Let the FDLE, FBI, DOJ, and Grand Jury complete their investigations. This case is less about race/ethnicity than it is about a guy who made some really stupid decisions. Personally, I believe he should be made to answer for his actions in our courts. Some say he is protected by the “stand your ground” statute, but in this case I don’t see how that statute would even apply and am disappointed that it is even being mentioned. However, I’m glad that the public didn’t let this go as it seems like some very questionable decisions were made by the Sanford PD and they just wanted this to go away. ------------------------- The future you choose excludes all others. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Just like PETA, God Hates Fags, ect... you're seriously just giving them power by giving them attention.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
OMG, but what if the Grand Jury doesn't indict Zimmerman? What if all the DOJ does is charge him with the hate crime of calling the victim a "coon" druing one of his calls to the PD? Wow, what then, huh? |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Then Florida's new motto should be 'Come to Florida... to hunt the most dangerous game of all!" because seriously, it's his fault the kid is dead...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Wow, what then, huh? I will be among many shocked people if that happens. But I wouldn't discount the notion ... after all they found 12 people to agree the Anthony girl was not guilty! |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Not my band.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG1fhJukAKA |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Looks like Zimmerman got himself a smart lawyer, and that is probably a good thing for him: Zimmerman's lawyer: 'Stand your ground' doesn't apply in Trayvon Martin case'
It's a shame that statute was even dragged into this mess in the first place. http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/24/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 ------------------------- The future you choose excludes all others. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Comment from former Florida governor Jeb Bush who does not believe "Stand Your Ground" applies in this case: "Stand your ground means stand your ground,” Bush said following a speech at the University of Texas at Arlington. “It doesn't mean chase after somebody who's turned their back." Here is the law. Interpret it for yourself.
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or
(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.
(5) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.
(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.
History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-27. Edited: 03/24/2012 at 10:17 AM by MaloTurista |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
News Flash. Big sharpton rally resheduled to old Amway Arena at noon on Sunday.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
From the Orlando Sentinel:
Updated: 4:51 p.m. SANFORD — Members of the New Black Panther Party are offering a $10,000 reward for the "capture" of George Zimmerman, leader Mikhail Muhammad announced during a protest in Sanford today.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Not to worry, , , , Jesse is on the way to get things straightened out.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Blacks Set Thirteen-Year-Old Kansas Boy Set on Fire For Being White -------------------------
"The problems we face today exist because the People who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for their living." |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I offer a $10000 reward for the decapitated heads of the perps in the Kansas incident.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
^^^^ "Baby, you can drive my car..." |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
7.62
|
||
|
|
||
2nd Light Forums
» N S R
»
Sharpton in Sanford
|
Topic Tools |
FuseTalk Basic Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.
dust.resin.water...... Get your copy from http://dustresinwater.com/